Today, we live in a highly charged political climate where truth is often obscured in relative terms. We live in a society where many times people are categorized and labeled inaccurately by the actions of others in their community or profession. A few people or a group of people in a community or profession do or say something resulting in the perception that everybody in that community or profession is of same mindset. The appraisal profession has experienced just that.
I have been in this profession for nearly 50 years. I have seen and witnessed many things. Appraisers are tasked with protecting the public trust, and yet, I have seen appraisers who knowingly and on an ongoing basis disregard facts and truth to provide reports with values or directions in values that advocate the cause of their client. I have weathered seasons marred by valuation professionals whose malfeasance adversely impacted the economy and society. However, after meeting and working with thousands of my fellows over the last half-century, I am convinced that our industry, like every other, will have unethical numbers who do not represent the majority, and I refuse to be lumped in with those unethical few.
The future of the valuation profession is not certain to me. The mission of the valuation professional has always been as objectively as possible to evaluate a property and analyze data to provide credible results that users could rely on to solve problems relating to their specific needs. Technological advances suggest we need to move toward automated valuation models that churn data through automated algorithms to produce valuations. This pressure to replace appraiser analysis techniques with data science rests in part on the assumption that algorithms will mimic the valuations of appraisers without the messy biases and ethical failings that affect human analysis.
For all the value of technology, we would be wise to avoid mistaking these tools for the solution. After all, algorithms themselves are simply tools that enshrine the biases and ethical failings of those who design them. As we improve the efficiency of our business practices, we must guard against also letting technology replace our creative innovation, our flexibility in response to the unforeseen, and most importantly, our unique ability to ethically apply subjective context to blind statistics.
If a user of valuation services finds it necessary to question the development and/or results of a valuation report prepared and signed by a credentialed valuation professional, that client can simply inquire. If inquiry is not productive and they believe an error, grievous error, or many errors have been made, there are numerous other recourses. In short, there are remedies available to the public and users of valuation services to correct inaccuracies or seek recourse and remedy. Where does one go to question or clarify AVMs?
Many advances have been made over the years to enhance techniques for developing real property valuations. Forty plus years ago I was taught to use building residual techniques to develop investment property valuations. Then we refined additional tools, like overall capitalization rates and discounted cash flow techniques. Residential appraisals were developed using the same three approaches currently available, but results were reported on postcards without any significant analysis.
Future technological advancements will certainly enhance the reliability and credibility of valuations for all types of properties.
What I do know is the future or our profession is in the hands of people – people who make judgements that have significant effects on the day to day lives of other people, and the success or failure of business and enterprise.
While the techniques used to develop real property valuations may change or be improved upon, the ethics of the people doing the work will never change. Ethics, therefore, must be a bedrock of our professional community.
We are not perfect by any means and never will be. We have made and will continue to make mistakes. Nevertheless, if our profession is to continue and grow and prosper, we must always seek to find the highest moral ground possible in our daily work and interactions with others by using principles of fairness, integrity, good faith, and honesty.
We need to be a professional community whose collective and individual ethics are beyond reproach. If each of us can strive to conduct our business lives as ethically as we are able, then the future of our profession should be ensured, because we will be recognized as belonging to a unified community whose members share a strong ethical core.
We must be a professional community whose ethics appear to be and are, in fact, beyond reproach. What’s more, we are a forward-looking community, not focused on past mistakes but guided and governed by the best ethical behavior we can muster. Strong ethics is an irresistible treasure seen and felt by our colleagues and clients. If each of us conducts our business lives as ethically as we are able, then the future of our profession will feature a powerful bulwark not easily toppled by markets, politics, or scandal and certainly not reproducible by the most sophisticated of tools.
Share this article
Written by : Donny Boucher
Donald Boucher is a Senior Residential Appraiser, member of the Appraisal Institute, and President of Boucher and Boucher Inc. Mr. Boucher began his career in the early 1970s. His practice is focused primarily on the valuation of all types of residential real property for a variety of intended users and intended uses. He has been qualified as an expert witness to testify in real estate valuation matters in many courts over the years and performs assignments for lenders, relocation companies, and many other users of valuation services.
In addition, he provides valuation consultation services to real estate developers, attorneys, property owners, and others. He has been active in his local chapter of the Appraisal Institute as well as the national AI for many years. In 2017 he was awarded the Lifetime Achievement award from the Appraisal Institute. Most recently, he has participated in various studies relating to the valuation of sustainable energy features.
4 Comments
Comments are closed.

I try to be ethical even when home owners blatantly lie to me and Realtors “embellish” oh…..square footage. I even try to laugh off not getting paid for an appraisal because my work was “deficient” per the AMC. Deficient because my value didn’t fit fannie mae guidelines. And oh…..AMCs hate that! Their Clients will be soooo angry! AMCs need to find pliable Appraisers afterall. And by being ethical I now risk being brought before the State perhaps and certainly blacklisted by the AMC and the Lender. So being ethical also has this twist. To be clear, I valued a new build, 1 total bedroom, well below the 376,000 offered price and outside the adjusted sale prices. Who the hell builds a 1 bedroom home with little chance of even adding a 2nd bedroom in the basement??? Resale on a 1 bedroom home? like 50 bucks? I could have been “ethical” in the demented minds of the AMC and “made it all work” but I chose to be really ethical. And I’m going to pay for it.
Why should I subscribe to ethics?
What is the ONLY basis for ethics?
I agree we must be ethical. The problem is the unethical people who don’t want to be ethical. Fred Vander Wal noted below all the other players like agents, sellers, buyers, borrowers, lenders, AMCs … who are not ethical. They want us to be unethical so they can get their value. I’ve never done that but clearly a few have. I will continue to value property ethically and properly.
Doing things the honest and correct way o the best of my abilities has always in the long run gotten me the best clients and those will to pay for that type of service. The problem I see lately is government overreach trying to correct an issue by lumping all appraisers in the same box without evidence to support the activists agenda and government’s wanting follow along to accumulate more centralized power.