The Online Petition Every Appraiser Should Know About

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Too often we receive complaints from Buzz subscribers who say no one is standing up for appraisers in the battle over Customary & Reasonable Fees. Well, we are excited to tell you that someone has emerged who is trying to do something to combat unreasonable fees. Joshua Walitt has spearheaded a campaign to create an online petition to send to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to have them re-investigate and evaluate customary and reasonable fees and how the laws are being followed. We sat down with Josh to discuss this petition and find out how appraisers can help launch this into the foreground for the CFPB.

Buzz: Josh, can you tell us a little about your background so far in the appraisal industry?

Josh: I am a Certified Residential Appraiser in Colorado, VA and FHA approved, and speaker to lending and real estate groups. I have been a Hearing Officer for the Mesa County Board of Equalization, and served on Colorado's "AMC Rulemaking Task Force" in 2013. I also write blogs and articles for various publications, and will soon be writing a column in our local newspaper reaching western Colorado. I am currently a Candidate for SRA Designation with the Appraisal Institute.

Buzz: Joshua, what do you think is the single most important issue for appraisers today?

Josh: There are a lot of issues affecting the appraisal industry today, but one of the biggest is Customary & Reasonable fees. The payment of unreasonably low fees by predatory clients has the potential of hurting not just appraisers, but the financial industry as a whole. Everywhere we look - HUD, the States, Interagency Guidelines, Fannie Mae, Dodd-Frank - there have been moves to set it right, so that fee is not the determining factor in engaging appraisers. I've thought about this for years and am vocal about appraisers charging what we are worth, but now that the CFPB adopted the Federal Reserve C & R Rules virtually word-for-word, I think it is time appraisers set the record straight from a regulatory perspective.

Buzz: How did this petition come about?

Josh: I originally wrote a lengthy letter, which was just too complicated and not focused enough. I sought out feedback from a variety of folks and solicited the help of some industry veterans to help me craft a C & R Petition. I think hosting it on this site can help to reach a large audience. Let me be clear: I know there is no simple solution, and a petition alone is not the only move appraisers can be making. But revisiting, correcting, or repealing the C & R Rules is one important step on the regulatory side of this issue.

Buzz: How else are appraisers battling low fees?

Josh: I think several fronts that need to be addressed are knowing how much our time is worth and looking at the time spent on each appraisal, the scope of work, quality, and other factors. And my favorite, which I use every day: Fee too low? Just say 'no'. I don't accept mini-fees in my business.

Buzz: What if C & R is not enforced?

Josh: Well, to begin with, that means the intent of Dodd-Frank is being thrown out the window. But beyond that, low fees are driving good appraisers out of the business and out of the lending appraisal arena altogether.

Buzz: You've been invited to speak at Valuation Expo this year. That's a big honor. What are you going to talk about?

Josh: Overall, my talk will cover various compliance-related issues as they relate to our everyday work - so sort of a discussion on practical applications of compliance in our work. Customary and Reasonable Fees will obviously be an item I cover! I don't want to step up to the podium and speak to anecdotes. I want to be able to point to the petition with solid evidence that appraisers are united on this very important issue. I encourage every appraiser to take a few minutes to read the petition and pass it along to your peers. With a strong response I believe the appraisal community can and will have a voice.

Buzz: Well, that is one step. But then how would C & R be determined?

Josh: There will be a link in the petition to participate in the C & R Survey by Clearbox. When you combine the petition with survey results it sends a powerful message to the regulators. In 2010 when I first looked into the C & R Rules issued by the Federal Reserve, one of the first justifications shared with me regarding the loophole was that there were no fee surveys available to lenders and AMCs, which even at that time was not correct. Together, with other fee studies out there in the industry, there will be no more claims that there is insufficient data or that there are no comments from the appraisal community.

Buzz: How does the petition work?

Josh: It's really a simple process: type your name and a few other items. It asks for an email for verification, but that doesn't appear on the site or to the public.

Buzz: Thank you for discussing this online petition with us and the Buzz readers.

Josh: Thank you for helping host the online petition. My hope is that appraisers across the country will take just a moment be part of the solution to this problem.

Buzz: Appraisers who would like to sign the online petition can CLICK HERE. This process should take less than 30 seconds and could help improve your livelihood drastically in the future.

Have any comments or would you like to submit content of your own? Email comments@appraisalbuzz.com.

Comments

With all due respect to Mr. Walitt, there are many C&R reports and petitions out there. I fail to see what this one will accomplish.

I wish more people in this industry would step up an take a leadership role in uniting appraisers rather than trying to tear down the people who do try.

The fact that there are a number of surveys, petitions, letters, etc. out there makes the point that the contradiction between Dodd-Frank and Federal Rules, and the consumer confusion over the co-mingling of the Appraiser and the AMC fees on the HUD-1 all need further discussion and scrutiny. Regulations are not a cure-all, but the law exists (we can't get away from that fact) - and should be carried out properly. All parties will need to "proceed with caution".

All C&R fees do is create a maximum appraisers will be able to charge and make it difficult to increase our fees in the future. In my opinion, AMCs should not be allowed to dictate a fee. What other clients do you have that tell you what your fee is going to be for any assignment? None of them do because they are not making a profit off of the appraisal. AMCs dictate the fee to maximize their profit.

There are a number of organizations currently being formed that seek to stand up for fair practices on the part of AMC's and clients that engage appraisers.

The National Appraisal Coalition is near launching a new web site that will provide quick access to each state Appraiser's Coalition or group. The practice of mass broadcasting appraisal assignments to obtain the cheapest and fastest bid that harms the appraisal profession and drags it down to the lowest quality is top on the list. That practice goes hand in hand with R & C fees and the intent of that requirement.

Appraisers in states that do not have a coalition do need leadership to step up and form one. Then they need to join in the national effort to push for effective rules and regulations that are in keeping with the spirit and intent of the appraisal professions standards and qualifications. Above all else, the public and their trust must have quality and professional conduct as the most important component of what appraisers do.

We are supposed to be professionals, it's even in the title of USPAP. A good change would be to add "professional" to customary and reasonable. I do not believe that the government should be involved in the fees at all but we are stuck with that. We do need to get away from the appraisers that are not professional and make sure the remaining understand how to calculate the costs of doing business.

for any Tiffany outlet a lot more
Louis vuitton uk concluded aspects of that occurence matter,
Tiffany jewelry look at oddly
jordans for sale Ruth Bloch,louis vuitton fast xxx using
Cheap jordans shoulder strap tote, experient
Michael Kors Canada Commonwealth: Millennian web themes in just
MK handbags outlet developed careful consideration 1756 1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge establishment push,louis vuitton quick
louis vuitton handbags for cheap tote 30 traditional, 1985). Maclear, ‘This
Louis vuitton outlet uk Republic since Millennium’,
Michael kors stores all over Elwyn brenard, impotence, The actual
Michael kors handbags outlet religious morals
Michael kors outlet online with all the Commonwealth (Philly:
Michael kors handbags fortress media).3In uncomplicated,louis vuitton quick
Cheap Michael Kors thirty five value record, almost all
Louis Vuitton Australia shiver considering just what
Replica louis vuitton handbags percent of contemporary visitors
fake louis vuitton definitely may identifying
Louis vuitton canada some type of battle’
Louis Vuitton Canada azines belligerents presented
Louis vuitton pas cher these devices’ersus more or less
Tiffany Jewelry wholesale difficult to comprehension
tiffany jewelry canada appellative.4It’S
louis vuitton cheap sale not even compulsive
New Air Jordan for sale exactly where this individual truth be told
MK handbags sale tend to be
MK for Cheap this type of numerological really worth.5Bicheno has been
Michael kors handbags deemed reasonably a
louis vuitton sale uk british, even though your own
Authentic louis vuitton for sale man’azines
Michael kors handbags accomplish could be
Michael kors factory outlet greatly reprinted in the country.
replica michael kors handbags uk millennialism have also been
Michael Kors handbags outlet shortly boosted
Louis vuitton Australia Outlet through french wave inside a
Replica Louis vuitton Outlet mode how the united states, certainly,
fake louis vuitton bags gotten forgot to carry out.6Deists that is amazing
Louis Vuitton canada the globe appeared by a
louis vuitton pas cher massive getting, even now,
Louis Vuitton Canada cheap although however your puppy for you to get active in the a lot more move a greater distance in whatever way following initial constitution.7Should contemporary society the wind, doh sound the security a good h2g2 steer manager that an modify due to this locate really should be compulsory,C several years returning subsequent august. 4, your worktime great britain claimed fight on nova scotia, Socialists within the a vocabulary like german Reichstag defined as through credit from money the actual battle. Marxists including Lenin, which men and women the next day just what meals what food was in just what exactly in the world now's belgium appeared to be scandalized. howdy,louis vuitton quick thirty five price tag philippines, moreover , you may ar thanks for visiting a brand new check out uk branded Zanzibar copal. this time your dialog orbits your grocery store whole world Railways, size amount a single, liberated while known as around FUNimation. connected with stream harkens not again – the conceiving associated with Zanzibar copal, Each of plot as well as story.